Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
Force analysis of a single rib.
Published 2024“…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. …”
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
Genes whose expression was decreased in RASMC subjected to Na<sup>+</sup>,K<sup>+</sup>-ATPase inhibition.
Published 2014“…<p>RVSMC were treated with 3 mM ouabain or K<sup>+</sup>-free medium for 6 hr. …”
-
55
Decrease of myopia progression with 0.025% atropine
Published 2018“…Myopic progression was significantly lower in group 1 (-0.43 +/- 0.19 D) than in group 2 (-1.24 +/- 0.37 D) and axial length increase was also significantly smaller in group 1(0.19 +/- 0.09 mm) than in group 2 (0.48 +/- 0.12 mm). There were no significant statistical differences regarding keratometry between groups. …”
-
56
-
57
-
58
BA decreases DUB activity in PC cells.
Published 2013“…(<b>B</b>) DUB assay showed that BA treatment of LNCaP cells significantly decreased DUB activity at 24 and 48 h relative to control treated cells ( = 1) (*, <i>P</i><5×10<sup>−5</sup>). …”
-
59
-
60