Showing 1,901 - 1,920 results of 100,777 for search '(( 12 nn decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((we decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (teer decrease)) ))', query time: 1.43s Refine Results
  1. 1901

    Nitric Oxide Oxidatively Nitrosylates Ni(I) and Cu(I) <i>C</i>-Organonitroso Adducts by Stefan Wiese (1626535)

    Published 2009
    “…The X-ray structures of <b>3a</b> and <b>3b</b> are similar to those of related Cu(I) alkene adducts, with N−O distances in the narrow range 1.333(4)−1.338(5) Å. …”
  2. 1902

    Nitric Oxide Oxidatively Nitrosylates Ni(I) and Cu(I) <i>C</i>-Organonitroso Adducts by Stefan Wiese (1626535)

    Published 2009
    “…The X-ray structures of <b>3a</b> and <b>3b</b> are similar to those of related Cu(I) alkene adducts, with N−O distances in the narrow range 1.333(4)−1.338(5) Å. …”
  3. 1903

    Nitric Oxide Oxidatively Nitrosylates Ni(I) and Cu(I) <i>C</i>-Organonitroso Adducts by Stefan Wiese (1626535)

    Published 2009
    “…The X-ray structures of <b>3a</b> and <b>3b</b> are similar to those of related Cu(I) alkene adducts, with N−O distances in the narrow range 1.333(4)−1.338(5) Å. …”
  4. 1904

    Nitric Oxide Oxidatively Nitrosylates Ni(I) and Cu(I) <i>C</i>-Organonitroso Adducts by Stefan Wiese (1626535)

    Published 2009
    “…The X-ray structures of <b>3a</b> and <b>3b</b> are similar to those of related Cu(I) alkene adducts, with N−O distances in the narrow range 1.333(4)−1.338(5) Å. …”
  5. 1905

    Nitric Oxide Oxidatively Nitrosylates Ni(I) and Cu(I) <i>C</i>-Organonitroso Adducts by Stefan Wiese (1626535)

    Published 2009
    “…The X-ray structures of <b>3a</b> and <b>3b</b> are similar to those of related Cu(I) alkene adducts, with N−O distances in the narrow range 1.333(4)−1.338(5) Å. …”
  6. 1906
  7. 1907
  8. 1908
  9. 1909

    Gibberellic acid in <i>Citrus</i> spp. flowering and fruiting: A systematic review by Alfonso Garmendia (814091)

    Published 2019
    “…The results on yield were highly erratic as we found increases, decreases, no effects or variable effects.…”
  10. 1910

    Flow diagram of the study. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
  11. 1911

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
  12. 1912
  13. 1913
  14. 1914

    S1 Data - by Mahmoud A. Alomari (14780446)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported adecrease” in SH during confinement. …”
  15. 1915
  16. 1916

    The participant demographic (n = 1844). by Mahmoud A. Alomari (14780446)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported adecrease” in SH during confinement. …”
  17. 1917

    Prevalence of smoking during COVID19 (n = 1844). by Mahmoud A. Alomari (14780446)

    Published 2023
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported adecrease” in SH during confinement. …”
  18. 1918
  19. 1919
  20. 1920