Paeameter ranges and optimal values. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Improved random forest algorithm. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Datasets used in the study area. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Evaluation of the improved random forest model. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Comparison of model metrics. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Flowchart of population spatialization. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…Firstly, recursive feature elimination using cross validation (RFECV), maximum information coefficient (MIC), and mean decrease accuracy (MDA) methods were utilized to select population distribution feature factors. …”

Patterns of lifetime use of substances by gender. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”

S1 Data - by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”

Factors associated with substance use. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”

Factors associated with personality traits. by Daniel Waiganjo Kinyanjui (15877725)

“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”

Fig 7 - by Ekramy Halawa (11785086)

Fig 6 - by Ekramy Halawa (11785086)

Fig 8 - by Ekramy Halawa (11785086)

Fig 9 - by Ekramy Halawa (11785086)

Model of energy regulation by extracellular adenosine during immune response and its impact on host-pathogen interaction. by Adam Bajgar (730380)

Fig 2 - by Nida Mansoora (11648641)

Fig 3 - by Nida Mansoora (11648641)

Intracellular images (×20000) of <i>S</i>. <i>cerevisiae</i> strain BH8 before (a) and after (b, c) culturing in MSM with 1.50 mM Cu²⁺ for 48 h; CW: cell wall; N: cell n... by Xiang-yu Sun (748032)

Fig 4 - by Nida Mansoora (11648641)

Fig 1 - by Nida Mansoora (11648641)