Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1881
Parrotfish Teeth: Stiff Biominerals Whose Microstructure Makes Them Tough and Abrasion-Resistant To Bite Stony Corals
Published 2017“…These fibers gradually decrease in average diameter from 5 μm at the back to 2 μm at the tip of the tooth. …”
-
1882
Parrotfish Teeth: Stiff Biominerals Whose Microstructure Makes Them Tough and Abrasion-Resistant To Bite Stony Corals
Published 2017“…These fibers gradually decrease in average diameter from 5 μm at the back to 2 μm at the tip of the tooth. …”
-
1883
Parrotfish Teeth: Stiff Biominerals Whose Microstructure Makes Them Tough and Abrasion-Resistant To Bite Stony Corals
Published 2017“…These fibers gradually decrease in average diameter from 5 μm at the back to 2 μm at the tip of the tooth. …”
-
1884
A New Highly Sensitive Method to Assess Respiration Rates and Kinetics of Natural Planktonic Communities by Use of the Switchable Trace Oxygen Sensor and Reduced Oxygen Concentrati...
Published 2014“…This method provides continuous real time measurements, allowing for a number of diverse possibilities, such as modeling the rate of oxygen decrease to obtain kinetic parameters. …”
-
1885
-
1886
-
1887
-
1888
Gibberellic acid in <i>Citrus</i> spp. flowering and fruiting: A systematic review
Published 2019“…The results on yield were highly erratic as we found increases, decreases, no effects or variable effects.…”
-
1889
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
1890
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
1891
-
1892
-
1893
S1 Data -
Published 2023“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported a “decrease” in SH during confinement. …”
-
1894
-
1895
The participant demographic (n = 1844).
Published 2023“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported a “decrease” in SH during confinement. …”
-
1896
Prevalence of smoking during COVID19 (n = 1844).
Published 2023“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The prevalence of smoking was 33.3%, 46.1%, and 21.1% for cigarettes (Cg), waterpipe (Wp), and E-cigarettes (ECg), respectively. Among the smokers, 38.5–45.8% reported a “no-change,” while 32.1–41.7% reported a “decrease” in SH during confinement. …”
-
1897
-
1898
-
1899
-
1900