Showing 861 - 880 results of 48,330 for search '(( 12 we decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.97s Refine Results
  1. 861
  2. 862
  3. 863
  4. 864
  5. 865
  6. 866
  7. 867
  8. 868
  9. 869
  10. 870
  11. 871

    The Immunologic Effects of Mesalamine in Treated HIV-Infected Individuals with Incomplete CD4+ T Cell Recovery: A Randomized Crossover Trial by Ma Somsouk (283498)

    Published 2014
    “…The effect of mesalamine in HIV-infected individuals, who exhibit abnormal mucosal immune activation and microbial translocation (MT), has not been established in a placebo-controlled trial. We randomized 33 HIV-infected subjects with CD4 counts <350 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> and plasma HIV RNA levels <40 copies/ml on antiretroviral therapy (ART) to add mesalamine vs. placebo to their existing regimen for 12 weeks followed by a 12 week crossover to the other arm. …”
  12. 872
  13. 873

    C2GnT1 gene knockdown decreases C2-O-sLe<sup>X</sup> glycoproteins and C2GnT1 activity. by Catherine A. St. Hill (357388)

    Published 2013
    “…Note the absence of a detected C2GnT1 protein 50 kDa band. (D) We observed a 30–40% decrease in reactivity with CHO-131 mAb by flow cytometry for LS174T and HepG2 cells that contained C2GnT1 shRNA. …”
  14. 874
  15. 875
  16. 876
  17. 877
  18. 878
  19. 879

    S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
  20. 880

    Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

    Published 2024
    “…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”