Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

MtDNA carryover removal and SCC integraty by MRR manipulation in mouse oocytes. by Xiaoyu Liao (8161995)

Exploring the Interaction Chemistry of Ammonia with <i>n</i>‑Hexadecane over Wide Pressure Ranges: An Experimental and Kinetic Modeling Study by Yongxiang Zhang (31421)

“…In this investigation, the ignition delay times (IDTs) of NH₃/<i>n</i>C₁₆H₃₄ mixtures were measured in a rapid compression machine at different NH₃ energy ratios (50%, 70%, and 90%), temperatures of 693–1047 K, pressures of 20–60 bar, and equivalence ratios of 0.5–1.0. …”

Paeameter ranges and optimal values. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Improved random forest algorithm. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Datasets used in the study area. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Evaluation of the improved random forest model. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

K-means++ clustering algorithm. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Comparison of model metrics. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Flowchart of population spatialization. by Zhen Zhao (159931)

“…To address these issues, a population spatialization model that integrates feature selection with an improved random forest is proposed herein. …”

Main testing instruments for the experiment. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Simulation major data. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Numerical conditions. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Airflow coefficients. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>g</i> and <i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at different return air outlet heights. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at ACH = 35/h. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

<i>K</i>_<i>c</i> at ACH = 20/h. by Chao Li (145513)

“…Compared to the traditional lower-side return air outlet <b><i>L</i></b>, the ranges of the non-uniformity coefficients for return air outlet <b><i>H</i></b> and <b><i>L</i></b> are 0.50 to 0.67 and 0.45 to 0.53, respectively. The average non-uniformity coefficient differs by 11.9%, and there is not a significant difference in uniformity with more than 20 air changes per hour. …”

Supplementary Material for: Development of a root caries prediction model in a population of dental attenders by Fee P.A. (13545517)