Showing 1 - 20 results of 6,591 for search '(( 17 ((sizes decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ) OR ( i ((values decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Schematic diagram of experimental injector size. by Lei Bai (631944)

    Published 2025
    “…During this period, the fractal dimension gradually decreases from the peak to around 1, and the flame’s outer contour transforms from complex to simple. (4) The volume of the droplet (<i>V</i>) affects both the peak value of the fractal dimension (<i>D</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>) of the flame and the time at which it occurs (<i>t</i><sub><i>max</i></sub>). …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Study 1_CFA1. by Chen-Yueh Chen (9740047)

    Published 2025
    “…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
  17. 17
  18. 18

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. …”
  19. 19

    Study 1_EFA. by Chen-Yueh Chen (9740047)

    Published 2025
    “…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”
  20. 20

    Study 2_Experiment 1. by Chen-Yueh Chen (9740047)

    Published 2025
    “…Findings from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in Study II indicate that in Experiment I, positive electronic word of mouth does not help improve value co-creation among spectators while negative electronic word of mouth does decrease value co-creation among spectators. …”