Search alternatives:
per decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
19 1 » 19 _ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
per decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
19 1 » 19 _ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
-
181
Morphology and property changes in PLA/PHBV blends as function of blend composition
Published 2018“…Both the tensile strength and Young?s modulus decreased with increasing PHBV content for the sequence of blends, and both parameters exhibited maximum values for 10?…”
Get full text
Get full text
-
182
-
183
-
184
-
185
-
186
-
187
-
188
-
189
Mixed Solid Municipal Waste-Based Biochar for Soil Fertility and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Published 2016“…Trays were watered twice daily to maintain moisture level between 10 and 12 percent. The percentage of seed germination was calculated and the plant growth measured as dry biomass. …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
190
-
191
-
192
Comparison of performance and health indicators between perimenopausal and postmenopausal obese women: the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT).
Published 2020“…This study examined the effects of 6 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on performance and health indicators in obese perimenopausal (PERIM) women and similarly aged and older postmenopausal women (POSTM1 and POSTM2, respectively). Sixteen PERIM women (average age 49.6 y), 21 POSTM1 women (average age 50.6 y), and 19 POSTM2 women (average age 69.6 y) completed a 6-week HIIT intervention. …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
193
-
194
-
195
Effect of mobile text messages on antiretroviral medication adherence and patient retention in early HIV care: An open-label, randomized, single center study in south Florida
Published 2020“…At the end of the 6-month study period, adherence to ART was 84.4% in the intervention group versus 73.5% in the control group (OR, 1.9; 95% CI 0.7–5.0; p = 0.194). Retention in care significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control group with the odds of retention increasing by 20% (OR, 1.2; 95% CI 1.1–1.5; p = 0.006). …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
196
-
197
-
198
-
199
-
200