Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
19 a » 19 _ (Expand Search), 19 p (Expand Search), 1 a (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
19 a » 19 _ (Expand Search), 19 p (Expand Search), 1 a (Expand Search)
-
321
-
322
-
323
-
324
Model performance with different sparsity rates.
Published 2024“…The experimental results showed that P-YOLOv5s-GRNF increased the mAP(mean average precision) by 0.8%, 4.3%, 3.2%, 0.7%, 19.3%, 9.8%, 3.1% compared to mainstream object detection algorithms YOLOv5s, YOLOv6s, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8s, YOLOv5s-Shufflenetv2, YOLOv5s-Mobilenetv3, YOLOv5s-Ghost, respectively. …”
-
325
Comparison of different lightweight models.
Published 2024“…The experimental results showed that P-YOLOv5s-GRNF increased the mAP(mean average precision) by 0.8%, 4.3%, 3.2%, 0.7%, 19.3%, 9.8%, 3.1% compared to mainstream object detection algorithms YOLOv5s, YOLOv6s, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8s, YOLOv5s-Shufflenetv2, YOLOv5s-Mobilenetv3, YOLOv5s-Ghost, respectively. …”
-
326
Pruning process.
Published 2024“…The experimental results showed that P-YOLOv5s-GRNF increased the mAP(mean average precision) by 0.8%, 4.3%, 3.2%, 0.7%, 19.3%, 9.8%, 3.1% compared to mainstream object detection algorithms YOLOv5s, YOLOv6s, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8s, YOLOv5s-Shufflenetv2, YOLOv5s-Mobilenetv3, YOLOv5s-Ghost, respectively. …”
-
327
Principle and structure of RFAConv.
Published 2024“…The experimental results showed that P-YOLOv5s-GRNF increased the mAP(mean average precision) by 0.8%, 4.3%, 3.2%, 0.7%, 19.3%, 9.8%, 3.1% compared to mainstream object detection algorithms YOLOv5s, YOLOv6s, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8s, YOLOv5s-Shufflenetv2, YOLOv5s-Mobilenetv3, YOLOv5s-Ghost, respectively. …”
-
328
-
329
-
330
-
331
-
332
-
333
-
334
Significant decrease of SMAD4 protein in DBA iPSCs.
Published 2015“…A) Slight decrease of mRNA level of <i>SMAD4</i> in the DBA iPSCs with <i>RPS19</i> or <i>RPL5</i> mutations. …”
-
335
-
336
Fenretinide decreases levels of PAX3/FOXO1 and its target genes in aRMS cell lines.
Published 2013“…Representative values of at least two independent experiments. <i>Columns,</i> mean; <i>bars</i>, s.d. E) eRMS RD cells were treated during 24 hours with different concentrations of fenretinide (0.5–1–5 µM, as indicated). …”
-
337
-
338
-
339
-
340
Decreased remyelination initiation is observed in Scribble cKO mice following focal demyelination in corpus callosum.
Published 2015“…In the contralateral (unlesioned) hemisphere (CL), no difference was seen in the proportion of axons in the corpus callosum that were myelinated in Scribble cKO compared to wild-type animals (A–C). Fewer remyelinated axons were observed in corpus callosum in the lesion area in Scribble cKO mice (E) relative to controls (D) as quantified in F; 0.4–0.5 μm: WT = 80.0% ± 9.8%, cKO = 41.3% ± 8.9% myelinated; 0.5–0.6 μm: WT = 79.4% ± 6.3%, cKO = 41.5% ± 9.5% myelinated; 0.6–0.7 μm: WT = 91.6% ± 3.0%, cKO = 44.3% ± 8.7% myelinated; >0.7 μm: WT = 92.7% ± 1.9%, cKO = 47.9% ± 2.5% myelinated. …”