Showing 1 - 7 results of 7 for search '(( 1_ we decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (_ decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta–analysis by Thomas Benichou (5047928)

    Published 2018
    “…T2DM patients had significantly (P<0.01) lower RR–intervals (effect size = –0.61; 95%CI –1.21 to –0.01), lower SDNN (–0.65; –0.83 to –0.47), lower RMSSD (–0.92; –1.37 to –0.47), lower pNN50 (–0.46; –0.84 to –0.09), lower total power (–1.52; –2.13 to –0.91), lower LF (–1.08; –1.46 to –0.69]), and lower HF (–0.79; –1.09 to –0.50). …”
  2. 2

    Table_1_Brain–Heart Interaction During Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation.docx by Kathrin Machetanz (10302452)

    Published 2021
    “…In the delta-band, there were frontal increases (RMSSD, pNN50, rrHRV, SDNN) and decreases (SDNN) across stimulation sites. …”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Family History of Hypertension Impairs the Autonomic Balance, but not the Endothelial Function, in Young Soccer Players by Walter Vargas (6798635)

    Published 2021
    “…Results The standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN; FM-N=314±185; FM-H=182.4± 57.8), the square root of the mean squared differences in successive RR intervals (RMSSD; FM-N=248±134; FM-H=87±51), the number of interval differences of successive NN intervals greater than 50ms (NN50; FM-N=367±83.4; FM-H=229±55), the ratio derived by dividing NN50 by the total number of NN intervals (pNN50; FM-N=32.4±6.2; FM-H=21.1±5.3) and the high (HF; FM-N=49±8.9; FM-H=35.3±12) and low-frequency (LF; FM-N=50.9±8.9; FM-H=64.6±12) components, in normalized units (%), were significantly lower in the FM-H group than in the FM-N group (p<0.05). …”
  6. 6

    EFFECTS OF ADAPTED CANOEING ON THE CARDIOPULMONARY SYSTEM OF PARAPLEGICS by Elizângela Márcia de Carvalho Abreu (6147902)

    Published 2022
    “…Results: After training there was no significant increase in RR (12.7%), SDNN (24.3%), rMSSD (50.0%), pNN50 (478.6%), LF (ms²) (53.3%), HF (ms²) (158.8%) SD1 (50.6%), SD2 (23.2%) and SampEn (20.2%). …”
  7. 7

    Table_2_Brain–Heart Interaction During Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation.docx by Kathrin Machetanz (10302452)

    Published 2021
    “…In the delta-band, there were frontal increases (RMSSD, pNN50, rrHRV, SDNN) and decreases (SDNN) across stimulation sites. …”