Search alternatives:
ms decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
ms decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs.
Published 2019“…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
-
6
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”
-
7
-
8
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…These mice exhibited a minimal change in noise-evoked PPy activity when comparing the first and second week of imaging (2-way ANOVA, F = 1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.11, post hoc baseline w1 50 dB: baseline w2 50 dB <i>p</i> = 1 Bonferroni corrected, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session) F = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.12, mean ± SE). …”
-
9
-
10
E<sub>50</sub> values.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
E<sub>50</sub> values of angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
15
Curve fitting of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
16
Fitting curves of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17
E<sub>50</sub> values of size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
18
E<sub>50</sub> fluctuation coefficient.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
19
Fitting relationship of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
20
Fitting curve of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”