Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
non decrease » note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
681
-
682
-
683
-
684
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…(B) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) decreases as a function of the true SI for a sample size of 1 minute (blue), 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). …”
-
685
-
686
-
687
-
688
-
689
Magnetic field setups in zero field (a) and vertically alternating field (b).
Published 2022Subjects: -
690
-
691
Alkaline Phosphatase, Soluble Extracellular Adenine Nucleotides, and Adenosine Production after Infant Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Published 2016“…Inhibition of alkaline phosphatase led to a marked decrease in 13C5-adenosine production (11.9μmol/L vs 2.7μmol/L; p<0.0001). …”
-
692
-
693
-
694
-
695
-
696
-
697
-
698
-
699
Experiment 2: Model-free analysis of effort discounting.
Published 2015“…Exemplary choices and fits are shown for one subject and two effort levels in the £2 (200p) block. <b>C</b>, Individual (coloured) and average (black) group indifference points show that effort discounting follows a concave, rather than convex, shape and scales with offer magnitude (40p vs. £2). …”
-
700
Decreased 5-Year overall survival in TNBC compared to non-TNBC (n = 314, p = 0.0001).
Published 2014“…<p>Decreased 5-Year overall survival in TNBC compared to non-TNBC (n = 314, p = 0.0001).…”