بدائل البحث:
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
nn decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), gy decreased (توسيع البحث)
c decrease » c decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decrease (توسيع البحث), rc decreased (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
nn decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), gy decreased (توسيع البحث)
c decrease » c decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decrease (توسيع البحث), rc decreased (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
-
38201
Regression results of crowding out effects.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38202
Article data.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38203
Overidentification test results.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38204
Quantile regression results.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38205
Instrumental variable regression results.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38206
Other robust regression results.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38207
Baseline regression results.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38208
Results of propensity score matching.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38209
Parallel trend test.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38210
Placebo test.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38211
Descriptive statistics of variables.
منشور في 2025"…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …"
-
38212
Improved GRU prediction unit structure diagram.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38213
Data expansion diagram of PM-GRU model.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38214
Feature fusion structure diagram.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38215
Average accuracy of different models.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38216
Comparison of errors on the coordinate axis.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38217
Running process of improved YOLOv4-Tiny.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38218
-
38219
Training steps of the improved YOLOv4-Tiny.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"
-
38220
Flowchart of SPM-GRU model operation.
منشور في 2024"…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …"