Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
40221
Parallel trend test.
Published 2025“…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …”
-
40222
Placebo test.
Published 2025“…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …”
-
40223
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2025“…Moreover, there is no interaction between talent subsidies and innovation incentives, or between talent subsidies and high-level talent innovation support, but there is an offsetting effect between the other policies. (3) The positive impact of science and technology talent policies exhibits a time lag, generally ranging from 4 to 5 years. …”
-
40224
Improved GRU prediction unit structure diagram.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40225
Data expansion diagram of PM-GRU model.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40226
Feature fusion structure diagram.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40227
Average accuracy of different models.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40228
Comparison of errors on the coordinate axis.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40229
Running process of improved YOLOv4-Tiny.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40230
-
40231
Training steps of the improved YOLOv4-Tiny.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40232
Flowchart of SPM-GRU model operation.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40233
-
40234
Loss variation curves of three models.
Published 2024“…Meanwhile, the improved model achieves a processing efficiency of 85 frames/s. In addition, compared with the traditional trajectory prediction model, the constructed model performs the best in table tennis ball trajectory prediction, with errors of 4.5 mm, 25.3 mm, and 35.58 mm. …”
-
40235
-
40236
-
40237
-
40238
Supplementary Material for: Use of Liraglutide 3.0 mg for Weight Management in a Real-World Setting in Switzerland
Published 2021“…Mean 7-month weight change from baseline in the full cohort was −4.1 kg (95% confidence interval: −5.0, −3.2; <i>p</i> < 0.001; −4.2%). …”
-
40239
-
40240