Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
Simultaneous ablation of Syt1 and Syt7 decreases the RRP size at inhibitory synapses: Rescue by WT but not mutant Syt1 or Syt7.
Published 2015“…Recordings were performed in the presence of 1 μM tetrodotoxin, 20 μM CNQX, and 50 μM AP5 to isolate inhibitory currents. <b>B.</b> Simultaneous ablation of Syt1 and Syt7 decreases the RRP size of inhibitory synapses in a manner that is rescued by WT Syt7 (Syt1<sup>WT</sup>) but not Syt7 with mutations in the top C2 domain sequences containing the Syt7 Ca<sup>2+</sup> binding sites (Syt7<sup>C2A</sup>*<sup>B</sup>*). …”
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
Claudin V is decreased following infection with Mtb.
Published 2024“…Exposure to Mtb H37Rv and HN878 decreased claudin V expression compared to uninfected controls in the frontal cortex (E), cerebral nuclei (J), brain stem (O), thalamus (T), and hippocampus (Y). …”
-
132
-
133
MVEC microvessel formation is restricted in hydrogels exhibiting increased stiffness or decreased concentration of adhesive peptides.
Published 2020“…(<b>E</b>) Total tubule length (mm/mm<sup>2</sup>) and (<b>F</b>) tubule diameter decreased significantly as hydrogel wt% increased. …”
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
Deletion of STX1B decreases the size of RRP in glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses.
Published 2014“…Mean RRP size estimated from integral charge transfer induced by application of 0.5 M sucrose solution (right; WT, 2.27±0.17 nC, <i>n</i> = 88; STX1B<sup>−/−</sup>, 1.39±0.14 nC, <i>n</i> = 62; <i>p</i><0.001, two sample <i>t</i>-test). …”
-
138
-
139
-
140