Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
Temporal changes in the RPR titer from before to after treatment.
Published 2023“…<p>The time course of the RPR titer from before to after treatment in each group is shown (2A, increased-RPR group; 2B, stable-RPR group; 2C, decreased-RPR group). …”
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
The frequency of co-expression of ALDH and CGA progressively decreases during colon tumorigenesis in FAP patients.
Published 2020“…The number of positively stained cells counted in each case included, normal crypts (n = 95), normal appearing FAP crypts (n = 90), FAP adenomatous crypts (n = 103), FAP colon carcinomas (n = 126). Fig 2F shows that in normal crypts, many cells staining for the colonic SC marker ALDH1 co-stained for chromogranin-A (CGA) and other NEC markers. …”
-
154
-
155
-
156
Image_2_Serum Zinc-α2-Glycoprotein Levels Were Decreased in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JPEG
Published 2019“…At the cutoff value of 7.955 μg/mL serum ZAG, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating patients with PCAD from controls were 50.5 and 78.0%, respectively. The combination of ZAG with other clinical variables including age, gender, BMI, SBP, FBG, TC, HDL-C, Cr, and Urea had significantly improved the diagnosis accuracy with a sensitivity of 82.6%, a specificity of 95.0%, and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.940–0.975, p < 0.05).…”
-
157
-
158
-
159
-
160