Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
81
Capzb2 coimmunoprecipitates with βIII-tubulin in brain lysates and decreases tubulin polymerization in vitro.
Published 2009“…(E) Capzb2 decreases the rate and the extent of tubulin polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner. …”
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
miR-100 decreases GBM proliferation and targets SMRT/NCOR2.
Published 2013“…All GBM lines showed significantly lower miR-100 expression. (B) miR-100 overexpression decreased GBM cell growth compared to control miR transfected group. …”
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
GluN2A(D731N) decreases current amplitudes and shortens synaptic-like response time course.
Published 2017Subjects: -
98
Decreased projections to LP in <i>Brn3b</i> mutants occur postnatally.
Published 2023“…(Right) Magnified view of the boxed areas showing the LP regions used for analysis. (<b>D</b>) Quantification was presented as a relative difference between the AP-covered LP area in controls and mutants (1.00 ± 0.07 for control, 0.20 ± 0.03 for cKO; <i>n</i> = 4 mice/group). …”
-
99
AS021 activity and Satb2 expression decrease within deep layers at postnatal stages.
Published 2011“…Graphs show mean ± SEM. Scale bars: 200 µm (A), 100 µm (B).</p>…”
-
100
Decreased MeCP2 expression in tTA::miR132 mice.
Published 2013“…(D) Western analysis of biological replicates (two animals per condition) confirming the reduction in MeCP2 expression in tTA::miR132 mice, along with quantitative densitometric analysis relative to endogenous ERK1 levels (E), presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3) (*P<0.05).…”