Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
dTTP excess causes a decrease of <i>in organello</i> mtDNA synthesis associated with secondary dCTP depletion.
Published 2011“…A. Effect of an excess of each dNTP on mtDNA replication. …”
-
108
-
109
Flies decrease the level of aggression as the availability of food resource increases.
Published 2014“…(d) The decrease in aggression seen in the largest food patch tested (left, 2376 mm<sup>2</sup>) can be reversed by decreasing the concentration of food to 30% (middle). …”
-
110
-
111
Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers—AFSR: A technique for decreasing false indications of presence from acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context
Published 2019“…Here we present the Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers—AFSR, a novel approach for decreasing false positives and increasing models’ precision in multispecies contexts. …”
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
EphA4 immunostaining is decreased adjacent to injury site in ephrin-A5-Fc treated mice.
Published 2011“…Arrows indicate lesion site. Scale bars in A–D, G,H, 100 µm; E,F, 50 µm.</p>…”
-
118
2-CDA decreases PIN 1 protein levels in 7WD10 cells.
Published 2013“…(B) ImageJ quantitation revealed significantly decreased PIN 1 protein levels at 0.1 mM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 µM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 µM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 µM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 µM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells n = 4 in each group. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, vs. untreated controls.…”
-
119
-
120