Showing 1,701 - 1,720 results of 122,056 for search '(( 2 d decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((step decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.86s Refine Results
  1. 1701
  2. 1702
  3. 1703
  4. 1704
  5. 1705
  6. 1706
  7. 1707
  8. 1708

    S5 Fig - by Cynthia Alsayyah (18452506)

    Published 2024
    “…<b>(D and E)</b> PerMit contacts in <i>cat2Δ</i> and <i>cit2Δ</i> cells. …”
  9. 1709
  10. 1710
  11. 1711

    <i>tho2</i> and <i>hpr1</i> selectively decrease the expression level of Rif1p. by Tai-Yuan Yu (328952)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) The Rif1p protein level is decreased in <i>tho2</i> and <i>hpr1</i> cells. …”
  12. 1712
  13. 1713

    Fenretinide decreases levels of PAX3/FOXO1 and its target genes in aRMS cell lines. by David Herrero Martín (286820)

    Published 2013
    “…D) Fenretinide did not decrease mRNA levels of FOXO1 in aRMS cells. qRT–PCR was carried out after treatment with an IC<sub>50</sub> concentration of fenretinide during different time points (24–48–72 hours). …”
  14. 1714
  15. 1715
  16. 1716

    Decreased remyelination initiation is observed in Scribble cKO mice following focal demyelination in corpus callosum. by Andrew A. Jarjour (343100)

    Published 2015
    “…In the contralateral (unlesioned) hemisphere (CL), no difference was seen in the proportion of axons in the corpus callosum that were myelinated in Scribble cKO compared to wild-type animals (A–C). Fewer remyelinated axons were observed in corpus callosum in the lesion area in Scribble cKO mice (E) relative to controls (D) as quantified in F; 0.4–0.5 μm: WT = 80.0% ± 9.8%, cKO = 41.3% ± 8.9% myelinated; 0.5–0.6 μm: WT = 79.4% ± 6.3%, cKO = 41.5% ± 9.5% myelinated; 0.6–0.7 μm: WT = 91.6% ± 3.0%, cKO = 44.3% ± 8.7% myelinated; >0.7 μm: WT = 92.7% ± 1.9%, cKO = 47.9% ± 2.5% myelinated. …”
  17. 1717

    Surviving female mice born from DIO or lean dams display a small decrease in rate of intake. by Pedro A. Perez (5807615)

    Published 2018
    “…There were no differences meal size (a) but slight decrease in rate of intake between groups (b). Further, there were no differences in meal duration, meal frequency, total caloric intake, dark cycle intake, light cycle intake, or in post meal interval (d-i). …”
  18. 1718
  19. 1719
  20. 1720