Inflammation and hyperoxia decreases fractional anisotropy in corpus callosum. by Felix Brehmer (121526)

“…(B) Significant decrease of FA was observed in the corpus callosum of the injured groups (LN, VH, LH) compared with control group (VN) due to a significant increase of D⊥ (i.e. myelination defect). …”

Effect of decreased cell numbers on metabolite peak intensities. by Venugopal Gunda (492731)

Initial RBC dominant clot compaction in the <i>in vitro</i> MCA model without and with collateral with alteplase applied at clinically relevant concentration (1.3 mg L^-1... by Sandra Thalerová (11434762)

Intraperitoneal injection protocol for inhibitors (A), inhibitors DAS and Y27632 reduced intestinal permeability (B) and intestinal adult worm burden (C) of infected mice. by Wen Wen Zheng (17721404)

“…Each group had five replicates. <b>C:</b> DAS and Y27632 reduced intestinal adult worm burden at 5 dpi. …”

Full model fit of the model predicting choosing the right option on screen on first choices (shown in Fig 2D and descripted in detail in the Materials and methods section). by Caroline I. Jahn (14522732)

Intramolecularly Coordinated (6-(Diphenylphosphino)acenaphth-5-yl)stannanes. Repulsion vs Attraction of P- and Sn-Containing Substituents in the <i>peri</i> Positions by Emanuel Hupf (1489165)

“…The gas-phase structures of <b>2</b>–<b>5</b>, <b>8</b>, and the triarylstannyl cations ArPh₂Sn⁺ (<b>7a</b>) and [ArPh₂Sn·NCMe]⁺ (<b>7b</b>) were obtained by geometry optimization at the B3PW91/TZ level of theory. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”

Heterogeneous Condensation on Simplified Viral Envelope Protein Structures by Kawkab Ahasan (18784843)

“…Complex glycoprotein structures were modeled as cylindrical pillars to analyze condensation rates and active surface areas across a range of <i>p/d</i> ratios (1.0, 1.2, 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, and ∞) and contact angles (θ = 15°, 75°, and 105°, corresponding to <i>f</i> = 3.0, 2.0, and 1.5) to address envelope geometries for a wide variety of viruses. …”