Search alternatives:
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
d decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
18161
-
18162
-
18163
-
18164
-
18165
Ablation study results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18166
LSDED structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18167
SSFF and TFE structural diagrams.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18168
Comparison of key data before and after pruning.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18169
5-fold cross-validation comparison results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18170
Improved structure of YOLO11.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18171
Shape-IoU structure diagram.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18172
YOLO11 structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18173
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18174
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18175
-
18176
-
18177
-
18178
Spleen cell phenotype in NZW/BXSB<sup>TLR7-/Yaa</sup> mice (n = 10) and WT littermates (n = 5): A: T cell, B cell and dendritic cell percentages. CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD11B subsets are shown as a percentage of the parental cell type. B: Total spleen cell numbers of T cells, B cells and dendritic cell total numbers. Note the decrease in activated (CD69<sup>+</sup>) and effector/memory (CD44<sup>+</sup>/CD62L<sup>-</sup>) CD4 T cells, activated (CD69<sup>+</sup>) B cells and dendritic cells in the TLR7<sup>-/Yaa</sup> mice. C: B cell subsets as a percentage of spleen lymphocytes. D: Total B cell numbers per spleen. Note the decrease in follicular and class switched B cells and the preservation of T2 cells in the NZW/BXSB<sup>TLR7-/Yaa</sup> mice. * p < 0.05, † p < 0.01.
Published 2015“…C: B cell subsets as a percentage of spleen lymphocytes. D: Total B cell numbers per spleen. Note the decrease in follicular and class switched B cells and the preservation of T2 cells in the NZW/BXSB<sup>TLR7-/Yaa</sup> mice. * p < 0.05, † p < 0.01.…”
-
18179
-
18180