Showing 1,581 - 1,600 results of 66,748 for search '(( 2 d decrease ) OR ( 50 ((ng decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.50s Refine Results
  1. 1581

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  2. 1582

    Effect on the metabolic clearance rate (MCR) of CK under the inhibition of recombinant CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. by Jian Xiao (253329)

    Published 2016
    “…The MCRs of CK were significantly decreased compared with those of the control for CYP3A4 and CYP2C9.…”
  3. 1583

    In <i>Drosophila</i> DSK and TO inhibits Gr64f gene transcription and optogenetic activation of Dsk-GAL4 neurons decreases the sensitivity of gustatory neurons in starved flies. by Di Guo (718480)

    Published 2021
    “…(<b>F</b>) Expression pattern of <i>Dsk</i>-GAL4 in the brain revealed by anti-GFP (F1) and anti-DSK (F2). Scale bars, 50 μm. (<b>G</b>) Electrophysiological recordings reveal that starved flies (24 h) show increased sensitivity of GRNs compared with refed flies (fed 1.5 h after starvation) and optogenetic activation of <i>Dsk</i>-GAL4 neurons (30 min) decreases the sensitivity of gustatory neurons in starved flies (24 h). …”
  4. 1584
  5. 1585
  6. 1586
  7. 1587
  8. 1588
  9. 1589
  10. 1590
  11. 1591
  12. 1592
  13. 1593
  14. 1594
  15. 1595
  16. 1596
  17. 1597
  18. 1598

    Morphological changes in the testis and epididymis. by Cao Wang (1500691)

    Published 2025
    “…D & H) PM2.5 + Vit rats showed marked increase in sperm density, which improved relative to the PM2.5 rats. …”
  19. 1599
  20. 1600

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”