PowerPoint Slides for: Cognitive Impairment in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: The Canadian Frailty Observation and Interventions Trial by Foster R. (3291450)

“…Cognitive impairment was defined as a MoCA score of ≤24. We determined the prevalence and risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with CKD stages G4-G5, not on dialysis. …”

<i>P. intermedia</i> strains bind purified ¹²⁵I-FI and FI from HI-NHS. by Sven Malm (326396)

“…<p>A) <i>P. intermedia</i> ATCC 25611, OMZ 248, OMZ 324, MH6, <i>S. aureus</i> strains ATCC 25923 and Newman (FI binding positive control) as well as <i>E. coli</i> DH5α (FI binding negative control) were incubated with ¹²⁵I-FI (250 kcpm). …”

Supplementary Material for: Characterization of the Bovine Pseudoautosomal Region and Comparison with Sheep, Goat, and Other Mammalian Pseudoautosomal Regions by Das P.J. (4120930)

“…Comparing the gene map of cattle PAR with the high-resolution maps of human, horse, and dog PAR allowed to estimate that the size of cattle PAR is approximately 5–9 Mb. BAC end sequence analysis showed that there is a gradient of decreasing GC content from PARter towards the PAB which is consistent with findings in human, mouse, and horse. …”

TXNIP targets glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway. by Stephanie Kim (2560966)

“…In TXNIP expressing cells, metabolites that increased were displayed in red and metabolites that decreased were displayed in blue. The heat map was created using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (<a href="https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/ModuleView.xhtml" target="_blank">https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/ModuleView.xhtml</a>) as described in Materials and methods. …”

Dietary polymer-coated urea enhances the goats lactational performance, excretion of microbial purine derivatives and blood metabolites in the semi-arid zone of Iran by Mitra Mazinani (14820738)

“…Inc., Lexington, KY) and 4) Polymer-Coated Urea (PCU- international patent number: A01K5/00, 0.7% PCU) based on dry mater intake. …”

Systemic effects of angiogenesis inhibition alter pharmacokinetics and intratumoral delivery of <i>nab</i>-paclitaxel by Anne Steins (839229)

“…As a consequence, after intraperitoneal administration of NPTX, plasma uptake (5.029 ± 4.35 vs. 25.85 ± 2.27 µM) and intratumoral delivery (5.48 ± 5.32 vs. 38.49 ± 2.805 pmol/mg) of NPTX were greatly impaired in DC101-treated animals compared to control animals. …”

Omniscan-induced cells express iron metabolism proteins. by Chhanda Bose (787135)

“…<p><b>(A)</b> Expression of ferroportin and other iron regulatory protein hepcidin by human PBMC treated with 0.5 mM Omniscan and deferiprone for 8 days, as shown by immunocytochemistry staining. …”

Image_4_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Table_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.pdf by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_7_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_6_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Video_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WMV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Rearranged chromosomes revert back to wild-type-like chromosomes in laboratory evolution experiments. by Shang-Lin Chang (226019)

“…Ancestral cells (A1–A5) and evolved cells (E1–E5) were grown in YPD media overnight, serially diluted and plated on YPD plates containing different concentrations of CuSO₄. …”

Quantification of localization and signaling during endocytosis. by Charanya Rengarajan (511093)

“…<p>Co-localization of Fgf8 is found with Clathrin, Rab7 and Lamp1, whereas co-localization of Rab5 is reduced (A). However, after stimulation of Hsc70, co-localization of Fgf8 and Rab5 is strongly increased. …”