Showing 21 - 40 results of 63,533 for search '(( 2 e decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((n decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.33s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28
  9. 29
  10. 30

    OP50 <i>E. coli</i>-fed nematodes are generally healthy while pathogen-fed worms demonstrate a decrease in overall health. by Michelle R. Bond (669241)

    Published 2014
    “…(B) The average pumping rate for nematodes fed <i>P. aeruginosa</i> is decreased when compared to N2 animals fed OP50. Worms with a <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> background exhibit the largest decrease in pumping rate. …”
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36

    NatB inactivation decreased the level of MAPK and proposed model of EGFR/MAPK signaling regulation by NatB and the N-end rule pathways. by Zhentao Sheng (107495)

    Published 2020
    “…(J) A proposed model of EGFR/MAPK signaling regulation by NatB and the N-end rule pathways through inversely modulating the levels of positive and negative pathway components is shown. Drk/Grb2 and MAPK, two positive components of the EGFR signaling pathway are targeted for degradation by the Arg/N-end rule pathway and E3 ubiquitin ligase Ubr4 while PP2AC, a negative regulator of EGFR signaling pathway, is targeted for degradation by the Ac/N-end rule pathway E3 ubiquitin ligase Cnot4. …”
  17. 37
  18. 38

    The GluN2B-C456Y mutation decreases recombinant NMDAR currents and alters receptor properties. by Wangyong Shin (6793040)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>(A) The GluN2B-C456Y mutation strongly decreases diheteromeric GluN1/GluN2B NMDAR currents in <i>Xenopus</i> oocytes. …”
  19. 39

    At lower concentrations, METH decreases LTP. by Jarod Swant (246454)

    Published 2010
    “…At 0.1 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.08 [<i>n</i> = 13(5)] (Fig. 1B); at 1 µM METH, LTP was 1.50±.07 [<i>n</i> = 13(7)] (Fig. 1C); at 10 µM METH, LTP was 1.58±.07 [<i>n</i> = 14(8)] (Fig. 1D); at 30 µM METH, LTP was 1.37±.06 [<i>n</i> = 15(4)] (Fig. 1E); and at 60 µM METH, LTP was 1.32±.24 [<i>n</i> = 4(2)] (Fig. 1E). …”
  20. 40