Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 fold » _ fold (Expand Search), 5 fold (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 fold » _ fold (Expand Search), 5 fold (Expand Search)
-
1781
-
1782
Temperature-Responsive Peptide–Nucleotide Coacervates
Published 2021“…Both the enthalpic and entropic parts of this nonelectrostatic interaction decrease in the order G/A/U/C/T, in accordance with nucleobase stacking free energies. …”
-
1783
Temperature-Responsive Peptide–Nucleotide Coacervates
Published 2021“…Both the enthalpic and entropic parts of this nonelectrostatic interaction decrease in the order G/A/U/C/T, in accordance with nucleobase stacking free energies. …”
-
1784
-
1785
-
1786
-
1787
Comparison of fold changes in off-rate for gD as a function of sub-type (type-1 vs. type-2).
Published 2017“…<p>Fold change was calculated from ratio of gD2 off-rate over the gD1 off-rate. gD1 vs. gD2 was tested in the context of both gD(285t) (A) and gD(306t) (B). …”
-
1788
-
1789
-
1790
-
1791
-
1792
-
1793
-
1794
-
1795
-
1796
-
1797
-
1798
-
1799
-
1800