Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 mm » 1 mm (Expand Search), 5 mm (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 mm » 1 mm (Expand Search), 5 mm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
FTY720 treatment decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model of hepatoblastoma.
Published 2019“…When tumors reached an average of 150 mm<sup>3</sup>, mice were randomized to receive vehicle (ORA-Plus, 50 μL, n = 7) or FTY720 (10 mg/kg body weight/day in ORA-Plus, 50 μL, n = 7) by oral gavage for 16 days. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Exposure to low CO<sub>2</sub> levels decreases ER cholesterol levels.
Published 2023“…<b>(B)</b> Bioluminescence recordings from the different conditions as depicted in <b>(A)</b>, the arrow indicates the time CO<sub>2</sub> was shifted from 5% to 1% (mean ± SE, <i>n</i> = 4 biological replicates per condition, AUC for 0 mM 0.34 ± 0.007, 1.59 ± 0.004 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 0.5 mM 1.00 ± 0.023, 2.68 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 1 mM 1.66 ± 0.07, 3.34 ± 0.04 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 3 mM 2.06 ± 0.02, 2.79 ± 0.07 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), 5 mM 2.02 ± 0.05, 2.43 ± 0.06 (<i>P</i> < 0.002), 7 mM 1.85 ± 0.01, 1.77 ± 0.02 (<i>P</i> < 0.02) two-sided Student’s <i>t</i> test). …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
DHT increases whereas orchidectomy decreases the weight and cross sectional area of hindlimb muscles.
Published 2013“…<b>C:</b> DHT increased the cross-sectional area of TA muscle by 22.3% (3.23±0.19 mm<sup>2</sup>, n = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.034), whereas orchidectomy decreased it by 20.8% (2.09±0.11 mm<sup>2</sup>, n = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.008) compared with control SOD1 mice (2.64±0.03 mm<sup>2</sup>, n = 3). …”