Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search)
n decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
781
-
782
-
783
Experimental investigation on the compressibility of Al/Al2O3 nanocomposites
Published 2016“…The results showed that the grain size of milled powders was about 43 nm with a noticeable presence of agglomerates at 10 wt.% of Al2O3. …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
784
-
785
STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TOWARD ACTIVITY RESTORATION OF NOVEL CYSTATHIONINE BETA-SYNTHASE MUTATIONS
Published 2024“…In contrast, all the other CBS mutation studies did not fully retain heme and, when compared to the wild-type enzyme, exhibited more significant impairments in both the canonical cystathionine synthesis and the alternative H2S-producing reactions. This reduced activity is consistent with both in vitro and in silico evidence, which indicates that the studied CBS mutations, except p.K72I, significantly decrease the overall protein's stability, which may represent the underlying cause of their pathogenicity. …”
Get full text
-
786
-
787
-
788
-
789
-
790
Electrocatalytic cogeneration of reactive oxygen species for synergistic water treatment
Published 2019“…The phenol decomposition and TOC removal with the pair are more than double their sums of the two half-electrodes at all Ecells with O2 purging, whereas such a synergistic effect is found only at high Ecells when N2 is purged. …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
791
-
792
-
793
-
794
-
795
-
796
-
797
-
798
Visual feedback training in young karate athletes
Published 2014“…Methods: 38 young male karate athletes were recruited and randomly in 2 groups: experimental group (SG; n=19, age =16.54 ± 2.00 yrs) and the control group (CG; n= 19, age 16.45 ± 1.53 yrs). …”
Get full text
Get full text
-
799
-
800