Showing 81 - 100 results of 119,786 for search '(( 2 n decrease ) OR ( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 1.84s Refine Results
  1. 81
  2. 82
  3. 83
  4. 84
  5. 85
  6. 86
  7. 87
  8. 88
  9. 89

    Loss of ALS2 results in decreased levels of the lysosome-dependent degradation of LC3 in fibroblasts. by Shinji Hadano (251529)

    Published 2010
    “…It is notable that a 6 hr of starvation leads to decreased levels of the LC3- and p62-immunoreactive signals in WT cells, but not in <i>Als2</i><sup>−/−</sup> cells. …”
  10. 90

    Decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis in <i>Mab21l2</i> mutant embryos. by Yohei Saito (180130)

    Published 2012
    “…Scale bars represent 100 µm (A, D, H, K) and 50 µm (N and P). (R) Quantitative RT-PCR for genes regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis (<i>N-myc</i>, <i>Id2</i>, <i>Cyclin D1</i>, <i>Cyclin D2</i>), marker genes of myocardial differentiation (<i>Anf</i>, <i>Chisel</i>, <i>Mlc2v</i>), genes essential for the development of the trabecular myocardium (<i>Erbb2</i>, <i>Erbb4</i>, <i>Bmp10</i>), genes essential for heart development (<i>Nkx2.5</i>, <i>Gata4</i>), and endocardial transcripts (<i>Flk1</i>, <i>Tie1</i>, <i>Tie2</i>) normalized to <i>Gapdh</i> expression using RNA from dissected hearts of E11.5 WT and <i>Mab21l2</i> mutant (−/−) embryos. …”
  11. 91
  12. 92
  13. 93
  14. 94
  15. 95
  16. 96

    Spatial training decreases the association between Ndfip1 and Nedd4 and decreases endogenous Beclin 1 ubiquitination in the hippocampus. by Wei-Lun Hsu (1756123)

    Published 2023
    “…Endogenous Beclin 1 ubiquitination level is decreased in Nedd4 siRNA-transfected rats (t<sub>1,6</sub> = 5.78, <i>p</i> = 0.001). …”
  17. 97
  18. 98

    Mean decrease in accuracy (MDA) of top 15 urine metabolites. by Liam E. Broughton-Neiswanger (8447220)

    Published 2020
    “…Urine metabolites with a mean decrease in accuracy ≥ 0.004 in at least one post-treatment time point (25) were considered for inclusion in the predictive model.…”
  19. 99
  20. 100