Dynamic viscosity of AWOE (control, 100% dispersant, and as a function of dispersant additive fraction). by Gerald F. John (7387964)

Decreasing aptamer concentrations (0–100 mM) reactions carried out in the presence of mycolactone (1μM). by Samuel A. Sakyi (840757)

S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 4 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…<p>(A) Emission of fluorescence spectra of S100A1 titrations showing a decrease in intensity with the addition of S100A4 at μM-level concentrations. …”

Rhodomyrtone dose dependently decreases production of <i>CXCL1</i>, <i>IL-36G</i>, <i>IL-36RN</i>, <i>MMP-13</i>, <i>S100A7</i>, <i>S100A8</i>, and <i>S100A12</i> transcripts by IL-17A/TNF-α-stimulated primary human keratinocytes. by Julalak Chorachoo (5855852)

Energetics and Rate Constants of Si₂H₆ and Ge₂H₆ Dissociative Adsorption on Dimers of SiGe(100)-2 × 1 by Chia-Liang Cheng (2476663)

“…Contrary to the intuitive mechanism involving a four-center transition state (TS) that yields two SiH₃(a) or GeH₃(a) in one step, the intermolecular bond scission on a dimer is accomplished in two consecutive steps of three-center TS, in which the first step is rate-limiting. …”

S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 2 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…The cross peaks, which exhibited decreased intensity, are boxed in green. (B) Ribbon diagram showing the structure of S100A1—decreasing residues are labeled on the structure in green.…”

S100A4 inhibits cell proliferation by interfering with the S100A1-RAGE V domain - Fig 1 by Md. Imran Khan (4853302)

“…(B) Ribbon diagram showing the structure of S100A4; intensity decreasing residues are labeled on the structure in cyan.…”

S100A1 interferes with the p53-MDM2 complex formation. by Deepu Dowarha (5673440)

Subjects:

Rcan2-mediated decrease in intracellular K⁺ involves Kcnk5b. by Xiaowen Jiang (8291814)

The energy, the total number of proteins, fat, and carbohydrates of the diets per 100 g. by Fatima Dikhanbayeva (11501962)

Decrease of excitability in small IB4-positive TG neurons over-expressing TRESK channels. by Zhaohua Guo (383295)

Imatinib decreases bacterial load of pathogenic <i>Francisella spp</i>. <i>in vivo</i>. by Ruth J. Napier (714545)

Activation of GluR5 increased neuronal excitability in interneruons but decreased excitability in pyramidal neurons. by Long-Jun Wu (47043)

“…When injected with current steps that ranged from −100 pA to 100 pA within 400 ms, interneurons showed fast spiking properties (top trace). …”

Shrub Invasion Decreases Diversity and Alters Community Stability in Northern Chihuahuan Desert Plant Communities by Selene Báez (271886)

“…</p><h3>Principal Findings</h3><p>Our results indicated that <em>Larrea</em> invasion decreased species richness during the last 100 years. …”

Mean frequency of the cultural trait <i>T</i> in the population when <i>T</i> decreases fertility. by Laurel Fogarty (143721)

Data_Sheet_1_Effect of decreased platelets on postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma.docx by Kenji Yagi (2990967)

“…In univariable logistic analysis, eosinophil-rich blood (≥100/μL eosinophils in peripheral blood) and a decreased PC were significant risk factors. …”

Depletion of circulating PMNs decreases the expansion of pericyte gaps and collagen IV LERs during inflammation. by Shijun Wang (89455)

Image_4_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”

Image_3_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”

Image_2_GPER-Induced ERK Signaling Decreases Cell Viability of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.tif by Yu-an Qiu (10272836)

“…In the present study, we found a remarkable difference in GPER staining between tumor tissue (100/141, 70.9%) and matched non-tumor tissue (27/30, 90.0%). …”