Data_Sheet_3_Changes in Metabolism and Proteostasis Drive Aging Phenotype in Aplysia californica Sensory Neurons.XLSX by Nicholas S. Kron (9377615)

“…The marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Aplysia) is a premier model for the nervous system uniquely suited to investigation of neuronal aging due to uniquely identifiable neurons and molecular techniques available in this model. …”

<b>Gene x environment interactions as drivers of lifespan variation in nematodes</b> by Justin Havird (2812975)

“…Healthspan (measured as worm activity) generally decreased with age, but in different ways for different genetic strains. …”

DataSheet_1_Increased PD-1+Foxp3+ γδ T cells associate with poor overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.pdf by Jiamian Zheng (12067958)

“…</p>Results<p>We found that PD-1 gene was positively correlated with FOXP3 gene and highly co-expressed PD-1 and FOXP3 genes were associated with poor overall survival (OS) from TCGA database. Then, we detected a skewed distribution of γδ T cells with increased Vδ1 and decreased Vδ2 T cell subsets in AML. …”

SI Movie 1: The vertical speed profile of the thermal resulting from the collective movements of the entire flock. from Synchronization, coordination and collective sensing during... by Máté Nagy (473859)

Table3_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Diagnosis of Lassa fever by Jason Bell (12905309)

Protocols for How to Use the HHSM by Virginia Martin Torrejon (16494798)

Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Post-traumatic stress disorder in German youth: representative claims data pre- vs. intra-COVID-19-pandemic by Jule Leickert (21598275)

The educational investment return evolution in Brazil during the 2000s by Izete Pengo Bagolin (7233095)

An hHsp70 residue S-Glutathionylation Biosensor Based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer by Yiying Zhang (8082776)

Shifts in food-related colour preferences in first trimester women by Farhad Dastur (476734)

Physiological and behavioural aspects of climate change vulnerability in ground-foraging passerines inhabiting South Africa’s Tankwa Karoo desert by James Short (20291754)

hemisphere_depolarized.gif by Noah Rubin (9924996)

<i>Therapies to reverse smoke-induced mucociliary dysfunction</i>_supplemental_figures by Silswal (20473463)

Degradation of 17α-methyltestosterone by hydroxyapatite catalyst by Daniela Langaro Savaris (4829286)

Untitled Item by Hirotake Yokota (17708010)

Supplementary figure 2 from Secondary Tumors Arising in Patients Undergoing BRAF Inhibitor Therapy Exhibit Increased BRAF–CRAF Heterodimerization by Lise Boussemart (14915303)