Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
-
7341
-
7342
-
7343
-
7344
-
7345
-
7346
Plasma miR-92a expression level and ROC curve in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by quantitative real-time PCR.
Published 2011“…<p>(A) Plasma miR-17-92a expression levels in normal subjects (open bars: Normal: n = 5) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (solid bars: DLBCL: n = 13), indicating that all of these miR-17-92a polycistronic miRs were remarkably decreased in plasma obtained from DLBCL patients. …”
-
7347
-
7348
-
7349
-
7350
Ablation study results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7351
LSDED structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7352
SSFF and TFE structural diagrams.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7353
Comparison of key data before and after pruning.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7354
5-fold cross-validation comparison results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7355
Improved structure of YOLO11.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7356
3-D comparison of key data across models.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7357
Shape-IoU structure diagram.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7358
YOLO11 structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7359
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
7360
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”