Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 we » 2 e (Expand Search), 2 de (Expand Search), _ we (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 we » 2 e (Expand Search), 2 de (Expand Search), _ we (Expand Search)
-
20161
Phosphopeptides with predicted MAPK site that showed decreased abundance in 1NM-PP1-treated <i>mak-2<sup>Q100G</sup></i> cells.
Published 2014“…</p>4<p>Proteins with a predicted MAPK docking motif (R/K-R/K-(X)<sub>1-5</sub>-I/L-X-I/L).…”
-
20162
-
20163
-
20164
-
20165
Comparison of RPA2 dynamics in WT, <i>Cdk2</i><sup><i>T160A</i></sup>, <i>and Cdk2</i><sup><i>−/−</i></sup> spermatocytes.
Published 2020“…<p>P40 chromosome spread preparations immunostained for RPA2 (green) and SYCP3 (red) are shown for WT (A–D), <i>Cdk2</i><sup><i>T160A</i></sup> spermatocytes (E–H), and <i>Cdk2</i><sup><i>−/−</i></sup> (I–K) for selected stages of meiotic prophase I. …”
-
20166
-
20167
-
20168
<em>In Vitro</em> and <em>Ex Vivo</em> Analysis of <em>CHRNA3</em> and <em>CHRNA5</em> Haplotype Expression
Published 2011“…For <em>in vitro</em> analyses, promoter haplotypes were sub-cloned into a luciferase reporter vector. When assessed in BE(2)-C cells, luciferase expression was equivalent among <em>CHRNA3</em> haplotypes, but the combination of deletion at rs3841324 and variation at rs503464 decreased <em>CHRNA5</em> promoter-derived luciferase activity, possibly due to loss of an SP-1 and other site(s). …”
-
20169
-
20170
-
20171
In <i>Drosophila</i> DSK and TO inhibits Gr64f gene transcription and optogenetic activation of Dsk-GAL4 neurons decreases the sensitivity of gustatory neurons in starved flies.
Published 2021“…Depletion of <i>Dsk</i> in all cells (<i>Actin5C-GAL4</i>) decreased <i>to</i> transcripts in flies. …”
-
20172
-
20173
-
20174
Decreases in white matter integrity in t(1;11) translocation carriers (n = 7) versus non-carriers (n = 13) and in patients (n = 34) versus controls (n = 33).
Published 2015“…To aid visualization the results (pfwe < 0.05) are thickened using the “tbss-fill” command. Statistics for FA decreases in the patient group versus controls for these peaks; cluster 1: p = 0.023 at [-3, 28, 6; left genu of corpus callosum], cluster 2: p = 0.032 at [29, 26, 15; right fronto-occipital fasciculus], cluster 3: p = 0.012 at [11, 26, 14; right genu of corpus callosum], cluster 4: p = 0.033 at [20, 25, 0; right acoustic radiation], and cluster 5: p = 0.031 at [28, -24, -8; right fornix] i.e. for clusters 1–5 respectively, see, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0130900#pone.0130900.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).…”
-
20175
-
20176
-
20177
-
20178
Performance of the intact model.
Published 2015“…At lower values of <i>α</i> two distinct regimes exist: the first has a phase difference between flexor centers less than 0.5 (lower branch) which corresponds to the activation pattern shown in <b>A</b> (LF leads, RF activates on LF’s shutdown, then a pause until LF activates again) and the second regime has a phase difference greater than 0.5 (upper branch) when RF activates first and LF activates on RF’s shutdown (not shown on <b>A</b>). …”
-
20179
-
20180