Protocols for How to Use the HHSM by Virginia Martin Torrejon (16494798)

Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

“…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”

Post-traumatic stress disorder in German youth: representative claims data pre- vs. intra-COVID-19-pandemic by Jule Leickert (21598275)

The educational investment return evolution in Brazil during the 2000s by Izete Pengo Bagolin (7233095)

An hHsp70 residue S-Glutathionylation Biosensor Based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer by Yiying Zhang (8082776)

Shifts in food-related colour preferences in first trimester women by Farhad Dastur (476734)

Physiological and behavioural aspects of climate change vulnerability in ground-foraging passerines inhabiting South Africa’s Tankwa Karoo desert by James Short (20291754)

hemisphere_depolarized.gif by Noah Rubin (9924996)

Supplemental Fig. S1.jpg by Jianyun Wang (10880955)

<i>Therapies to reverse smoke-induced mucociliary dysfunction</i>_supplemental_figures by Silswal (20473463)

An alert on the recent fall of the fiscal reaction in Brazil by EDUARDO LIMA CAMPOS (6674225)

Degradation of 17α-methyltestosterone by hydroxyapatite catalyst by Daniela Langaro Savaris (4829286)

Untitled Item by Hirotake Yokota (17708010)

TAK-242 reverses the visceral hypersensitivity phenotype in DIO mice. by Mónica Tramullas (2736064)

“…<p>Administration of the selective TLR4 antagonist TAK-242 (i.v. 10mg/kg) significantly reduces visceral pain responses in DIO (A) but not in lean mice (B). …”

Supplementary figure 2 from Secondary Tumors Arising in Patients Undergoing BRAF Inhibitor Therapy Exhibit Increased BRAF–CRAF Heterodimerization by Lise Boussemart (14915303)

RTSS-Voice: Application to everyday clinical care (Wolfberg et al., 2023) by Jeremy Wolfberg (17623466)

“…There were two frequent targets: (a) increased volition and (b) decreased strained voice quality. …”

Impact of varying sample density on Basis Pursuit with Polynomial Detrending (BPWP) outputs, participant 1. by Irena Balzekas (14053412)

“…<p>(A) Raw data showing hourly rate of inter-ictal epileptiform discharges (IED) detected from the left hippocampus, updated every 20 minutes. …”

Image_1_Combination of Fe(OH)3 modified diatomaceous earth and qPCR for the enrichment and detection of African swine fever virus in water.TIF by Hao Wu (65943)

“…A high adsorption rate of about 99.99 (±0.01)% and a high recovery rate of 64.01 (±10.20)% to 179.65 (±25.53)% was achieved by using 1g modified diatomaceous earth for 10 L ASFV contaminated water. …”