Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
Decreased FA number in Rgnef−/− MEFs on fibronectin (FN) at 90 min.
Published 2012“…Cells were fixed and analyzed for FA formation by paxillin staining (green), f-actin (phalloidin, red), and nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as shown in a merged image. Scale is 10 µm. Significantly-reduced adhesion number (B) and decreased median adhesion size (C) in Rgnef−/− compared to normal (Rgnef+/+) MEFs. …”
-
203
Down-regulation of Gli decreased ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion.
Published 2014“…ES2 and SKOV3 cells were treated with control vehicle (DMSO) or GANT61 (20 µM) for 48 hr. Subsequently, cells were stained with Gli2 and visualized under a confocal microscope. …”
-
204
Downregulation of SPHK1 expression decreases the resistance of glioma cells to apoptosis.
Published 2013“…(B) Silencing of SPHK1 led to significant decrease of enzymatic activity in glioma cells. (C) Knockdown of SPHK1 enhances cell death. …”
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
-
212
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
Tunicamycin produces a concentration- and time-dependent decrease in cell viability in SH-SY5Y cells concomitant with caspase-3 activation.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) Treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with tunicamycin (0.1–5µM) for 24 h caused a progressive decrease in cell viability as measured by Calcein AM cleavage assay. …”
-
217
-
218
-
219
-
220
OCA alone markedly decreases and combined with Gemcitabine or Cisplatin abrogates growth of iCCA xenografts.
Published 2019“…However, co-treatment of OCA with Gemcitabine or Cisplatin resulted in a tumor volume significantly lower compared to Gemcitabine or Cisplatin alone (p < 0.05). Means ± SE of N = 5 for each group. * p < 0.05 vs controls, <sup>&</sup> p < 0.05 vs OCA, <sup>¤</sup> p < 0.05 vs Cisplatin alone, <sup>§</sup> p < 0.05 vs Gemcitabine alone. …”