Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
20 c » 2 c (Expand Search), 20 _ (Expand Search), 25 c (Expand Search)
5 c » 25 c (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
20 c » 2 c (Expand Search), 20 _ (Expand Search), 25 c (Expand Search)
5 c » 25 c (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
Decreased projections to LP in <i>Brn3b</i> mutants occur postnatally.
Published 2023“…(<b>H</b>) Quantification (1.00 ± 0.09 for control, 0.45 ± 0.03 for cKO); unpaired two-tailed Student’s <i>t</i> test (mean ± SEM; <i>p</i> < 0.0001 [****] at P4/P5; <i>p</i> = 0.0004 [***] at P8/P9; <i>p</i> = 0.0012 [**] at P12/P13). …”
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
The ratio between the bias in the naïve SI and shuffle SI decreases with tuning specificity, but not with sample size.
Published 2022“…(C) The bias ratio (mean ± SEM) is maintained between a sample size of 1 minute versus 5 minutes (cyan) and 20 minutes (green). y = x is shown in black. …”
-
38
-
39
-
40