Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
20 cm » 20 c (Expand Search), 10 cm (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
20 cm » 20 c (Expand Search), 10 cm (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
Jurkat and HeLa survival decreases with increasing electric field amplitude and pulse number.
Published 2013“…For all exposures, Jurkat cells are more sensitive than HeLa cells. Data points represent the average survival. (mean +/−s.e., n = 3–5).…”
-
63
Fold decrease in virulence gene expression of <i>Salmonella in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i><sup>a</sup>.
Published 2014“…Values represent down-regulation (fold-decrease) of gene expression.</p>#<p>Value for each gene represents a significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05) between the treatment and control samples in the <i>in vitro</i> experiment. …”
-
64
A homozygous point mutation in the <i>Mrps34</i> gene causes a decrease in the MRPS34 protein.
Published 2015“…The 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions are shown as grey boxes and the predicted mitochondrial targeting sequence is shown as a black box (predicted using MitoProtII, [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005089#pgen.1005089.ref040" target="_blank">40</a>]). …”
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…<p>(<b>A–B</b>) Bath perfusion of DHPG for 3 min reduced GlyR-IPSCs (<b>A</b>; 70.2 ± 4.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[16] = 6.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, paired Student <i>t</i> test), but not GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor–mediated IPSCs (<b>B</b>; 102.9 ± 3.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.347, <i>p</i> = 0.743) in spinal slices of mice. …”
-
80