Showing 20,301 - 20,320 results of 20,503 for search '(( 20 mean decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((teer decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 0.61s Refine Results
  1. 20301

    Table_12_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  2. 20302

    DataSheet1_Insights into the reactivity and lithium plating mechanisms of ultra-thin metal oxide coatings for anode-free solid-state lithium metal batteries.docx by Michael J. Counihan (4852780)

    Published 2023
    “…Increasing Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> thickness decreases the practical current density compared to unmodified Cu (30 µA/cm<sup>2</sup>), but increasing ZnO thicknesses can double or triple this value. …”
  3. 20303

    Table_14_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  4. 20304

    Table_3_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  5. 20305

    Table_11_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  6. 20306

    Table_15_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  7. 20307

    Loss of MLL1 in adult mice. by Neha Goveas (11790822)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>(A) Giemsa-stained sections from the femur of <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/+; RC/+</i></sup> and <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/FC; RC/+</i></sup> mice. …”
  8. 20308

    Table_5_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  9. 20309

    Data_Sheet_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.PDF by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  10. 20310

    Table_9_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  11. 20311

    Table_4_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

    Published 2024
    “…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”
  12. 20312

    <strong>Bull trout streamflow and temperature linear SCR model</strong> by Patti Wohner (16398345)

    Published 2023
    “…These extremes provided a unique opportunity to retrospectively compare bull trout survival and migration under potential climate change scenarios. …”
  13. 20313

    Data_Sheet_1_An Improved Natural Transformation Protocol for the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.PDF by Matthew A. Pope (8710278)

    Published 2020
    “…However, Synechocystis possesses multiple genome copies per cell which means that segregating mutations across all genome copies can be time-consuming. …”
  14. 20314

    Image 3_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

    Published 2025
    “…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
  15. 20315

    Intermittent fasting enhances long-term memory consolidation, adult hippocampal neurogenesis and expression of longevity gene Klotho (Microarray dataset) by Sandrine Thuret (10326662)

    Published 2021
    “…Relatively loose criteria were initially used to filter the data (to minimize analytical false negatives), but genes were required to pass these criteria for each of the four methods to be considered further (four out of four methods) to minimize analytical false positives. </p> <p>A fold change of 1.2 along with a t-test p-value of less than 0.05 was used in RMA and dChip, and a confidence of 50% or higher was used in the Drop Method. …”
  16. 20316

    Image 2_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

    Published 2025
    “…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
  17. 20317

    Image 1_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

    Published 2025
    “…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”
  18. 20318

    S1 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
  19. 20319

    S3 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”
  20. 20320

    S2 Data - by Renjie Wang (1986553)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). …”