Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
461
-
462
-
463
-
464
E<sub>50</sub> values of angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
465
Curve fitting of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
466
Fitting curves of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
467
E<sub>50</sub> values of size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
468
E<sub>50</sub> fluctuation coefficient.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
469
Fitting relationship of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
470
Fitting curve of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
471
-
472
Image_1_IL-12p40/IL-23p40 Blockade With Ustekinumab Decreases the Synovial Inflammatory Infiltrate Through Modulation of Multiple Signaling Pathways Including MAPK-ERK and Wnt.TIF
Published 2021“…At 12 weeks 6/11 patients met ACR20, 2/11 met ACR50 and 1/11 met ACR70 improvement criteria, at 24 weeks this was 3/8, 2/8 and 1/8 patients, respectively. …”
-
473
-
474
-
475
-
476
Genetic characterization of <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> isolated in Osaka between 2011 and 2017: Decreased detection rate of macrolide-resistance and increase of <i>p1</i> gene ty...
Published 2019“…However, in 2015 and after, the detection rate of MRMP decreased significantly and did not exceed 50%. Genotyping of the <i>p1</i> gene of these isolates showed that most of MRMP strains harbored type 1 <i>p1</i> gene. …”
-
477
Expanding Three-Coordinate Gold(I) Anticancer Agent Chemical Space
Published 2025“…The complexes demonstrated submicromolar cytotoxic activity against human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-468 with IC<sub>50</sub>’s in the range of 0.4–5.0 μM. Complex <b>2e</b> shows high potency in vitro and decreases 3D-breast cancer mammosphere viability. …”
-
478
Hepatic Expression of Detoxification Enzymes Is Decreased in Human Obstructive Cholestasis Due to Gallstone Biliary Obstruction
Published 2015“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The levels of hepatic detoxification enzymes were significantly decreased in human obstructive cholestasis, and these decreases were positively associated with a marked reduction of FXR levels. …”
-
479
-
480
<i>Pf-Rel</i> knockdown decreased the <i>Nacrein</i> gene expression level.
Published 2015“…Reactions were completed in triplicate. cm: NaCl control solution. Both <i>Nacrein</i> and <i>Pf-Rel</i> mRNA expression level in controls are attributed a relative value of 1.0. tm-3-15 and tm-6-15: samples injected with15 ng <i>Pif-Rel</i> dsRNA 3 or 6 days respectively. …”