Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3 point » 3d point (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3 point » 3d point (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search)
-
901
Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection.
Published 2012“…<p>A) C57BL/6 mice or CCR2 KO mice receiving Gr1-depleting antibody were infected with either 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> NMII <i>Coxiella</i>. …”
-
902
-
903
-
904
-
905
-
906
-
907
-
908
-
909
-
910
-
911
-
912
-
913
Panel (a) compares SO<sub>2</sub> emissions prescribed over the historical period in the CMIP5 simulations (solid grey) with three inventory-based estimates of historical emissions...
Published 2013“…<p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> Panel (a) compares SO<sub>2</sub> emissions prescribed over the historical period in the CMIP5 simulations (solid grey) with three inventory-based estimates of historical emissions [<a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034008/article#erl467068bib1" target="_blank">1</a>, <a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034008/article#erl467068bib10" target="_blank">10</a>, <a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034008/article#erl467068bib11" target="_blank">11</a>]. …”
-
914
-
915
-
916
-
917
-
918
-
919
Total history dependence decreases for small time bins Δ<i>t</i>.
Published 2021“…The smaller the time bin, the higher the risk that noise in the spike emission reduces the overall predictability or history dependence in the spiking, whereas an overly large time bin holds the risk of destroying coding relevant time information in the spike train. Thus, we chose the smallest time bin Δ<i>t</i> = 5 ms that does not yet show a substantial decrease in <i>R</i><sub>tot</sub>. …”
-
920