Showing 100,641 - 100,660 results of 104,723 for search '(( 3 points decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((step decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 2.02s Refine Results
  1. 100641

    DataSheet_1_Increased PD-1+Foxp3+ γδ T cells associate with poor overall survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.pdf by Jiamian Zheng (12067958)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>We found that PD-1 gene was positively correlated with FOXP3 gene and highly co-expressed PD-1 and FOXP3 genes were associated with poor overall survival (OS) from TCGA database. Then, we detected a skewed distribution of γδ T cells with increased Vδ1 and decreased Vδ2 T cell subsets in AML. …”
  2. 100642
  3. 100643

    Table3_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  4. 100644
  5. 100645
  6. 100646

    Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  7. 100647

    Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  8. 100648

    Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  9. 100649
  10. 100650
  11. 100651
  12. 100652
  13. 100653
  14. 100654
  15. 100655
  16. 100656
  17. 100657
  18. 100658
  19. 100659
  20. 100660

    TAK-242 reverses the visceral hypersensitivity phenotype in DIO mice. by Mónica Tramullas (2736064)

    Published 2016
    “…<p>Administration of the selective TLR4 antagonist TAK-242 (i.v. 10mg/kg) significantly reduces visceral pain responses in DIO (A) but not in lean mice (B). …”