Search alternatives:
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3 points » _ points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search)
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
3 points » _ points (Expand Search), _ point (Expand Search), 5 point (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
TMD residues decrease sensitivity.
Published 2017“…Glu residues are color coded based upon effect, with residues in red producing a significant decrease in pH<sub>50</sub>, and in yellow, an insignificant or weak effect, whereas the dark purple and magenta for His residues are synonymous to the red of Glu residues. …”
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
-
149
FTY720 treatment decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model of hepatoblastoma.
Published 2019“…The mean ± SEM for each treatment group were calculated and depicted in a bar graph. …”
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
Adaptation to cool temperature decreases basal and stimulated lipolysis and increases <i>de novo</i> lipogenesis and TAG synthesis.
Published 2021“…Addition of 10 μM TOFA and 50 μM of C75 was for 3 hours before and throughout the lipogenesis assay. …”
-
156
-
157
Decrease of synchronization measures during a pre-ictal interval.
Published 2013“…Averages over the first 150000 sample points of each time series indicate a distinct decrease of each synchronization measure during the pre-ictal interval (bottom row). …”
-
158
-
159
-
160
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…These mice exhibited a minimal change in noise-evoked PPy activity when comparing the first and second week of imaging (2-way ANOVA, F = 1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.11, post hoc baseline w1 50 dB: baseline w2 50 dB <i>p</i> = 1 Bonferroni corrected, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session) F = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.12, mean ± SE). …”