Search alternatives:
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
cm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
-
981
-
982
-
983
-
984
-
985
Amplitude for A/L = 0.29.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
986
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
987
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
988
Amplitude for A/L = 0.03.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
989
-
990
EGCG decreases RSK2-mediated cell viability.
Published 2015“…Differences were evaluated using the Student’s t-test and the asterisk (*) indicates a significant decrease in viability in RSK2<sup>+/+</sup> MEFs compared to RSK2<sup>-/-</sup> MEFs (<i>p</i> < 0.05).…”
-
991
-
992
-
993
-
994
-
995
-
996
-
997
-
998
-
999
-
1000
Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels
Published 2013“…</strong> Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels. …”