Search alternatives:
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), i non (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
e non » _ non (Expand Search), a non (Expand Search), i non (Expand Search)
-
961
-
962
-
963
-
964
-
965
-
966
-
967
-
968
-
969
-
970
-
971
Decreased oscillatory flow decreases <i>klf2a</i> expression.
Published 2009“…<p>(A) RFF is decreased by alterations in heart rate. …”
-
972
Decreased Sho levels in ScN2a-Sho cells.
Published 2011“…(<b>C</b>) Quantification of Sho levels in ScN2a-Sho-1 (<i>n</i> = 10) and ScN2a-Sho-2 (<i>n</i> = 5) subclones revealed a significant decrease of 40–45% compared to the uninfected parental cell line (<i>n</i> = 15) (***<i>P</i><0.001).…”
-
973
-
974
FUD transiently decreased IOP in mice injected with Ad5-TGFβ2 viral vector.
Published 2020“…(B) IOPs were monitored for 5 more days (until Day 22) in a subset of mice from A. …”
-
975
-
976
-
977
-
978
-
979
-
980
Increases in 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and decreases in ascorbic acid following RYGB.
Published 2013“…B) For ascorbic acid, the ANOVA model did not detect group-specific changes over time (no group:time interaction), but indicated significant decreases from T0 to T6 in both groups. Overall, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and ascorbic acid were significantly different at each time point between OB and OB/D subgroups (p<0.01, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007905#pone-0007905-t002" target="_blank"><b>TABLE 2</b></a>).…”