Showing 801 - 820 results of 99,787 for search '(( 5 ((((nm decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( 5 step decrease ))', query time: 1.31s Refine Results
  1. 801
  2. 802

    Differentially regulated genes in cells with increased or decreased expression of miR-106a-5p. by Feng Zhi (294362)

    Published 2013
    “…(C) A Venn diagram of the overlap of altered genes with increased or decreased miR-106a-5p expression. …”
  3. 803

    The effect of glibenclamide on channel activity at +20, 0 and -20 mV. by Sajjad Salari (736104)

    Published 2015
    “…The addition of 50 μM glibenclamide resulted in a decreased current jump amplitude and a reduction in P<sub>o</sub>. 100 μM glibenclamide caused a total channel inhibition at +20 and 0 mV (n = 5), but was ineffective at -20 mV. …”
  4. 804

    LP I<sub>h</sub> metamodulation is rapid and reversible. by Wulf-Dieter C. Krenz (693267)

    Published 2015
    “…<p><b>(A) The time course for metamodulation in 5nM DA</b>. …”
  5. 805
  6. 806
  7. 807

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…<p>(<b>A–B</b>) Bath perfusion of DHPG for 3 min reduced GlyR-IPSCs (<b>A</b>; 70.2 ± 4.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[16] = 6.707, <i>p</i> < 0.001, paired Student <i>t</i> test), but not GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor–mediated IPSCs (<b>B</b>; 102.9 ± 3.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.347, <i>p</i> = 0.743) in spinal slices of mice. …”
  8. 808
  9. 809

    TGF-β-mediated EMT decreases Dlg5 expression. by Takuhito Sezaki (169150)

    Published 2012
    “…TGF-β treatment induced EMT and decreased Dlg5 expression. The results are representative of at least three independent experiments.…”
  10. 810
  11. 811
  12. 812
  13. 813
  14. 814
  15. 815
  16. 816
  17. 817

    Fig 5 - by Kevin Tsai (197484)

    Published 2024
    “…Case 1 represents the scenario where the scaling factor <i>n</i> starts with 5 and increase to 12 in 5×10<sup>3</sup> simulation time steps, and then decrease to 7 in 5×10<sup>3</sup> simulation time steps. …”
  18. 818
  19. 819
  20. 820