Search alternatives:
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
-
1461
-
1462
-
1463
-
1464
-
1465
-
1466
-
1467
-
1468
-
1469
-
1470
-
1471
-
1472
-
1473
Pretreatment with terazosin (0.5, 1 mg/kg) reversed the decrease in EEG amplitude produced by modafinil (90 mg/kg, i.p.).
Published 2013“…The increase in EEG amplitude may be interpreted as synchronization and a decrease in EEG can be interpreted as a desynchronization. …”
-
1474
Data_Sheet_2_Hepcidin Decreases Rotenone-Induced α-Synuclein Accumulation via Autophagy in SH-SY5Y Cells.ZIP
Published 2020“…We demonstrated that SH-SY5Y cell viability was impaired after rotenone treatment in a dose-dependent manner. α-syn expression and iron content increased under a low concentration rotenone (25 nM for 3 days) treatment in SH-SY5Y cells. …”
-
1475
Data_Sheet_1_Hepcidin Decreases Rotenone-Induced α-Synuclein Accumulation via Autophagy in SH-SY5Y Cells.PDF
Published 2020“…We demonstrated that SH-SY5Y cell viability was impaired after rotenone treatment in a dose-dependent manner. α-syn expression and iron content increased under a low concentration rotenone (25 nM for 3 days) treatment in SH-SY5Y cells. …”
-
1476
-
1477
The wound healing microenvironment restored GJIC but did not directly decrease tumor cells.
Published 2015“…(B and C) The combination of three compounds led to angiogenesis and optimal fibroblast proliferation but did not directly decrease A549 cancer cells. The results are presented as mean±SE (n = 5/group) **<i>p</i> < 0.01 <i>vs</i> control group.…”
-
1478
-
1479
-
1480