Showing 221 - 240 results of 100,619 for search '(( 5 ((((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 points decrease ))', query time: 1.50s Refine Results
  1. 221
  2. 222

    Thrombin-induced decreased lamellipodia protrusion frequency and actin stress fiber formation. by Jerome W. Breslin (548352)

    Published 2015
    “…<i>B</i>. Thrombin initially decreased the mean protrusion frequency of local lamellipodia. …”
  3. 223
  4. 224

    Inflammation is not sufficient to account for decreased relative bacterial numbers in higher dose infection. by Matthew Calverley (109776)

    Published 2012
    “…Groups were comprised of 5 mice with Mean and SEM plotted for each group. …”
  5. 225
  6. 226
  7. 227

    Disruption of bacterial K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis decreases Mtb colonization of macrophages. by Nathan J. MacGilvary (6294314)

    Published 2019
    “…Murine bone marrow-derived macrophages were infected with WT, Δ<i>ceoBC</i>, or <i>ceoBC</i>* (complemented mutant) Mtb, and CFUs tracked over time. Data are shown as means ± SD from 5–6 wells, representative of 3–4 independent experiments. …”
  8. 228
  9. 229

    The 2lox Lsd1 variant shows decreased binding to known interactors. by Thomas B. Nicholson (406800)

    Published 2013
    “…For the two single point mutants, the M448V mutation has a more profound effect on CoREST binding. *: immunoglobulin heavy chain. …”
  10. 230
  11. 231
  12. 232
  13. 233
  14. 234
  15. 235
  16. 236
  17. 237
  18. 238
  19. 239

    Flow diagram of the study. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
  20. 240

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

    Published 2023
    “…A total of 162 patients were included. The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”