Search alternatives:
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
-
1944
-
1945
Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels
Published 2013“…</strong> Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels. …”
-
1946
GFP activity is decreased in DES.
Published 2017“…AB—PAS and serial immunohistochemical section of the left eye, which received PBS, and paired-right eye which received BAK show a decrease in the number of conjunctival goblet cells producing Muc5b (blue arrows) and non-Muc5b producing (white arrows) cells. …”
-
1947
-
1948
-
1949
-
1950
-
1951
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
-
1955
A Yoga Strengthening Program Designed to Minimize the Knee Adduction Moment for Women with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Proof-Of-Principle Cohort Study
Published 2015“…A secondary objective was to determine whether the program could improve mobility and fitness, and decrease peak KAM during gait. …”
-
1956
Tacrolimus Decreases Albuminuria in Patients with IgA Nephropathy and Normal Blood Pressure: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Efficacy of Tacrolimus on IgA Nephropathy
Published 2013“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean value of pcUACR at 12-week and 16-week visits (primary outcome) was decreased more in the Tac group compared to the control group (–52.0±26.4 vs –17.3±29.3%, p = 0.001). …”
-
1957
-
1958
-
1959
-
1960