Showing 21 - 40 results of 106,308 for search '(( 5 ((((non decrease) OR (point decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 c decrease ))', query time: 1.42s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…The original traces were taken at the time points indicated by the numbers 1–3. (<b>C</b>) The inhibitory effect of DHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was blocked by MPEP (92.4 ± 4.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 1.573, <i>p</i> = 0.177) but not by CPCCOEt (53.5 ± 3.7% of baseline at 15–20 min post-DHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 14.343, <i>p</i> < 0.001). …”
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28

    Loss of C9orf72 decreases mTOR activation. by Janet Ugolino (3359054)

    Published 2016
    “…C9orf72-/- MEF cells show a decrease in p-S6K1 when compared with wild-type cells. …”
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34

    Dispersion-temperature of microgels decreases at lower pHs. by Chi-Shuo Chen (234719)

    Published 2015
    “…<p>As pH is reduced from 8.0 (black) to 7.7 (blue) to 7.5 (red) to 7.3 (green), non-linear microgel dispersion-temperature changes were observed while pH decreases. …”
  15. 35

    Proteasome activity was decreased in the <i>myc-rpt6-S119A</i> mutant. by Esther Magdalena Marquez-Lona (4183126)

    Published 2017
    “…RP = Regulatory Particle, CP = Core Particle. (C) The chymotrypsin-like activity of 26S proteasomes in whole cell lysates of stationary phase cells (A<sub>600</sub>>5.0) was monitored by Suc-LLVY-AMC cleavage over time on microplate reader (ex. 360nm and em. 465nm). …”
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38

    Increases in 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and decreases in ascorbic acid following RYGB. by David M. Mutch (37665)

    Published 2013
    “…B) For ascorbic acid, the ANOVA model did not detect group-specific changes over time (no group:time interaction), but indicated significant decreases from T0 to T6 in both groups. Overall, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and ascorbic acid were significantly different at each time point between OB and OB/D subgroups (p<0.01, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007905#pone-0007905-t002" target="_blank"><b>TABLE 2</b></a>).…”
  19. 39
  20. 40