Search alternatives:
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
ppm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
web decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a web » _ web (Expand Search)
-
21
Image5_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.TIF
Published 2021“…</p><p>Methods: The study was registered in PROSPERO under registration number CRD42018094903. A comprehensive literature search from four electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science) yielded nine eligible records for statistical analysis. …”
-
22
-
23
-
24
PPM1A directly dephosphorylates STING and TBK1 and prevents STING aggregation.
Published 2015“…(D) PPM1A decreases phosphorylation of TBK1 in transfected HEK293 cells. …”
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Phosphocreatine and ATP were decreased in the hearts CCCP-administered rats.
Published 2015“…<p>(A) Representative images of <i>in situ</i> cardiac <sup>31</sup>P magnetic resonance spectra. ppm, parts per million. …”
-
33
Presentation 1_Prehospital tranexamic acid decreases early mortality in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf
Published 2025“…Data were pooled under a random- or fixed-effects model using RevMan 5.4 with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as the effect measures.…”
-
34
Wnt5a expressing tumors demonstrate a decrease in markers of the basal tumor subtype.
Published 2014“…Values are means +/− standard error (n = 6 MMTV-Wnt1, 3 fields per tumor; n = 5 MMTV-Wnt1;MMTV-Wnt5a, 3 fields per tumor). MMTV-Wnt1;MMTV-Wnt5a tumors demonstrated a significant decrease in K6-expressing cells as measured by T-test (* = p<0.05).…”
-
35
Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators
Published 2017“…The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. …”
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
Evaluating the Potential of Ozone Microbubbles for Inactivation of Tulane Virus, a Human Norovirus Surrogate
Published 2024“…After 2, 10, and 20 min postgeneration, the ozone concentration of microbubbles naturally decreased from 4 ppm to 3.2 ± 0.2, 2.26 ± 0.19, and 1.49 ± 0.23 ppm and resulted in 1.43 ± 0.44, 0.88 ± 0.5, and 0.68 ± 0.53 log<sub>10</sub> viral reductions, respectively, while the ozone concentration of aqueous ozone decreased from 4 ppm to 2.52 ± 0.07, 0.43 ± 0.05, and 0.09 ± 0.01 ppm and produced 0.8 ± 0.28, 0.29 ± 0.41, and 0.16 ± 0.21 log<sub>10</sub> reductions against Tulane virus, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.0526), suggesting that structuring of ozone in the bubbles over the applied treatment conditions did not have a significant effect, though future study with continuous generation of ozone microbubbles is needed.…”