Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 wt » _ wt (Expand Search), 5 ht (Expand Search), i wt (Expand Search)
-
441
-
442
-
443
-
444
-
445
-
446
Decreased branching, partial right isomerization and epithelial proximalization in CKO lungs.
Published 2008“…<p>(a–d) β-gal staining of <i>Dermo1<sup>Cre/+</sup>/Rosa26R</i> WT lungs at E11.5 and E13.5 reports Cre recombination activity in the mesenchyme of the embryonic lung. …”
-
447
-
448
-
449
A homozygous point mutation in the <i>Mrps34</i> gene causes a decrease in the MRPS34 protein.
Published 2015“…The 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions are shown as grey boxes and the predicted mitochondrial targeting sequence is shown as a black box (predicted using MitoProtII, [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005089#pgen.1005089.ref040" target="_blank">40</a>]). …”
-
450
-
451
-
452
-
453
-
454
-
455
-
456
-
457
-
458
-
459
-
460
<i>Dmd<sup>mdx</sup></i> rats are characterized by muscle weakness and by a decrease in a spontaneous activity.
Published 2014“…<i>Dmd<sup>mdx</sup></i> rats showed fatigue with a decreased force grip across the five pulls, and significant values are obtained for the two last trials that were reduced to ∼70% when compared to Trial 1. …”